I remember him saying, “You don’t want to go to many football games. It will be a unique experience for you.” I didn’t know what he meant at the time, but I would find out.–Sylvester Brooks, MTSU Student and civil rights activist in mid-1960s,from an interview given in 2000
Author’s Note: Since writing this article in August 2015, Elizabeth Catte has written an article on Forrest Hall for the official blog of the National Council on Public History, available here: http://publichistorycommons.org/a-confederate-on-campus/.
As of today, Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) has a Confederacy problem. Granted, a lot has changed since the 1960s. For one, MTSU no longer has a man in Confederate garb on football sidelines, nor does the MTSU band play “Dixie” as the unofficial fight song. But there is still an ominous structure with “Forrest Hall” emblazoned upon its side, named after a Confederate general and slave trader. Why does this symbol to the Confederacy exist at MTSU? Why does it persist? And why did (and does) a state university founded 46 years after the Civil War proudly associate itself with a founder of the KKK?
A few weeks ago, Matt Follett wrote a great piece for this very blog entitled “Confederate Iconography and Southern College Football.” In it, Matt connected Confederate imagery to sport through college football games in the South, primarily those at Ole Miss. In brief, Matt argued that administrative policies do not deter the display of Confederate flags at college sporting events or prevent “southerners from rallying and advocating for Confederate iconography.” In his words, “It appears changing the proverbial ‘hearts and minds’ of defiant southerners is a lost cause.” I like his use of the phrase “lost cause” here.
This post is, first, a follow-up on Matt’s by analyzing the troubling—and ongoing—connections to the Confederacy of my current university, MTSU. In the late-1960s and 1970s, MTSU successfully purged its brutally racist public image at sporting events, but remnants of MTSU’s racist “heritage” are still scattered throughout campus. By and large though, MTSU’s public image today is not significantly different from any other mid-sized public university with a mediocre football team…except for the fact that Nathan Bedford Forrest (one of the founders of the KKK) still has a symbolic presence on our campus.
Second, this post is an effort to bring this historical context to a current (and ongoing) MTSU debate. Like many universities, MTSU has an ROTC program; unlike most universities, our ROTC program is based in a building named after Nathan Bedford Forrest, a notorious Confederate general with no connection to the university whatsoever. As of this writing, current MTSU President Sidney McPhee is supposedly holding a series of meetings to “revisit” the name of Forrest Hall, as announced via public statement on 24 June, although there seems to be no administrative movement as of right now. However, there is absolutely student movement. A protest is scheduled for this Thursday.
To be fully clear, I believe the name of Forrest Hall should be changed. This post is not a call for political correctness; it is a call for awareness, justice, and to end MTSU’s ahistorical association with a founder of the KKK.
WHO WAS FORREST
A quick background on Nathan Bedford Forrest, for those of you unfamiliar. Forrest was a lieutenant general in the CSA Army and, by all military accounts of the time, led many successful military campaigns primarily in middle Tennessee. More importantly though, he was a slave trader, war criminal, and terrorist. Before the Civil War, Forrest made a fortune trading enslaved peoples; during the war, Forrest’s men brutalized Union soldiers, most notably massacring African-American Union soldiers at Fort Pillow after they surrendered; and after the war, Forrest became a prominent leader of the first Ku Klux Klan.
Forrest defenders deny, many to this day, his role at Fort Pillow and the KKK and excuse his slave trading as a common practice in his day. But even in a best case scenario, Forrest was a violent, absolutist white supremacist, despite what the Sons of Confederate Veterans may have you believe about his changing views in his final years of life. Some argue that Forrest was a product of his times, which is of course true to a point, yet Forrest did things that very few Southern white men did at the time—made a fortune in the slave trade, massacred surrendered enemy soldiers, and led others in illegal, oppressive, and murderous action against African Americans. Forrest cannot be redeemed from this action just because he gave one half-decent speech in his dying days.
I do not intend to debate Forrest as he lived; I do intend to analyze how Forrest has been canonized at MTSU. To be absolutely clear, there is no direct connection between Forrest and MTSU. Even at the dedication of Forrest Hall, the only connection that could be made was that Forrest’s command once “rendezvoused on or near the present campus.” No matter your opinion, you must agree this is a tenuous connection.
ORIGINS OF MTSU’S FORREST CONNECTION
Forrest died in 1877; MTSU opened (as Middle Tennessee State Normal School) in 1911. In 1913, a faculty committee chose the school’s official colors—blue and white—and explained these were chosen because the pair was practical, economical, and “could be purchased across the counter in any general merchandise store.” Newspapers unofficially named sports teams the “Pedagogues,” but this name was never popular on campus.
In 1934, the local newspaper asked the student body for name suggestions. The winning submission was Blue Raiders, which still stands as the university’s mascot. A common misconception today is that the name “Raider” was derived from “Forrest’s Raiders,” but the winning entrant was actually a slightly modified version of Colgate University’s “Red Raiders.” As a relevant aside, it should be noted that “Rebels” finished just three votes behind in second place.
While “Blue Raiders” may not be directly associated with Forrest, it was certainly implied within athletics by the end of World War II. For example, when the university considered a name change in 1944, the head football coach proposed the name Forrest State College to match the “Raider” nickname.
But the name “Blue Raiders” wasn’t enough for MTSU President Quinn Smith. Upon entering his position in 1938, Smith believed that the “Raiders” needed a better symbol around which to rally school spirit. Sports mascots are symbolic usually, more representative of an idea than an individual (such as Ole Miss’s Colonel Reb), but MTSU officials chose to associate the university with very specific individuals from the past. At least one school official suggested Confederate general John Hunt Morgan, but according to another MTSU administrator, “President Smith felt a native of Middle Tennessee would be a better representative, and he ultimately decided on Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Civil War cavalryman from Chapel Hill, Tennessee.” According to alumni publications, Smith viewed Forrest with great personal admiration and believed that Forrest “represented or should represent the spirit of the team and the remainder of the college.”
At President Smith’s behest, MTSU’s publicity officers incorporated Forrest into their materials at least as early as 1945. By the mid-1950s, Forrest’s image dominated campus life, on decals, bookstore supplies, and campus newspaper Sidelines, not to mention the new ROTC building named Forrest Hall (also chosen by President Smith). Students formed a Nathan Bedford Forrest Club, and others sold “rebel flags to boost the school’s southern spirit.” Confederate battle flags were apparently everywhere on MTSU’s campus.
Most visible though was the Forrest-lookalike mascot on horseback. From 1945 to 1967, “That Blue Devil” rode along the sidelines of MTSU football games at Horace James Field while “Dixie” played in the stands. Dixie wasn’t the official fight song, but the band played it often and it was clearly the favorite of most MTSU fans.
I am certain the author of the Spring 1960 alumni newsletter chuckled to themselves when they wrote the Forrest mascot: “One cannot help thinking that ‘That Devil’ must turn over, at least once or twice, each time ‘blue’ is affixed across his symbol.”
While Confederate symbols were popular amongst the all-white student body at this time, it did not sit well with everyone. For example, the student who won the mascot contest with “Blue Raiders” in 1934 did not appreciate the new interpretation of the mascot, openly speaking on the Forrest symbolism: “One [memory] that I didn’t like was when one of the presidents and one of the public relations men decided they needed a reason for the name.” Most likely, the Forrest imagery was a tactic utilized by Smith (and others) to suppress integration efforts and the nascent Civil Rights movement on the then all-white campus.
INTEGRATION AND ATHLETIC MASCOT CHANGES
MTSU classrooms finally integrated in 1962, with athletic integration coming three years later when the first African-American athlete debuted on the track and field team. Three more years later, in 1968, J.W. Harper became the first African-American player on MTSU’s football team, but even at this late date the football locker room and dormitories remained segregated.
While black students were first taking classes and competing for MTSU sports teams, the university furthered its attachment to Nathan Bedford Forrest. In 1967, MTSU built a new student center, and on the outside of that building was placed a large seal of the university’s official mascot–Nathan Bedford Forrest on horseback. This was not received well by much of the student body, especially the small but growing African-American population, as evidenced by a spontaneous student tradition of casually pelting the seal with rocks when walking past.
During the next year, with rights movements seeing hard-fought success nationwide, the student body at MTSU spoke up. Sylvester Brooks, an African-American MTSU student, wrote an article appearing in the campus newspaper asserting that Forrest symbols were offensive—and oppressive—to MTSU’s African-American students. A large number of responses sympathetic to Brooks’ points poured into the newspaper, and a student-led campaign launched aspiring to remove the Forrest and Confederate symbols at MTSU.
Further revealing the tension was an altercation between an African-American MTSU basketball player and the Forrest mascot when the player punched or shoved the mascot after the mascot patted him on the back. Supposedly, the Forrest mascot was ordered to stay away from the court, and sometimes the arena altogether, for MTSU basketball games. The student government deadlocked on the issue initially, but eventually passed a resolution to urge the university to adopt a new “symbol and mascot similar to other schools.”
In response, MTSU President Smith’s successor, M.G. Scarlett, formed a committee to decide the next mascot for sporting events. This committee decided to select a new mascot that “would not recall the elements of the Civil War and be more palatable to the minorities on campus and in the community.” The committee chose to do away with the Confederate Blue Raider for a more neutral, somewhat cartoonish cavalry uniform. A few different dogs were also used as game day mascots for a while. The Forrest mascot was never seen again, but was not officially replaced until a 1976 MTSU football game with the debut of “a more modern figure”–a Tennessee walking horse named Wink’s Choice. A horse mascot was not long for football games however; Wink’s Choice had a hard time walking on the track surrounding the field, so the equine mascot was quietly discarded as well.
But of course, this was not the end of MTSU’s attachment to white supremacy. On the night of 11 Dec. 1970 and during this mascot transition, white MTSU students burned a cross on campus. About sixty black students immediately marched to President Scarlett’s home and demanded action. A week later, Scarlett addressed the campus and demanded an end to all racism at MTSU. Scarlett would go on to “persuade” university fraternities from wearing and displaying Confederate flags at football games and the marching band from playing “Dixie.” The Music Department penned a new MTSU song, although they were not pleased with “altering a traditional aspect of MTSU’s cultural heritage” (even though the song was hardly an MTSU tradition). Throughout the 1970s, President Scarlett slowly replaced Forrest imagery with more neutral symbols, such as when, in 1978, the university seal was officially changed from Forrest on horseback to MTSU call letters. MTSU ordered yet another sports mascot—some type of strange-looking swashbuckler that some even described as a superhero.
And thus, a burning cross and the subsequent outrage precipitated the death of the MTSU’s open attachment to Confederate symbolism. To be clear though, Scarlett wasn’t exactly a champion of civil rights; he was more a champion of good publicity. Scarlett would in coming years, for example, suppress media coverage of student protests and arrests, hoping to project an image of MTSU as calm, safe campus during a time when many college campuses experienced highly publicized protests.
By the mid-1980s, there were three symbols of Forrest left on campus: athletic department stationary, the university seal on the student center, and the Forrest Hall ROTC building. Stationary was phased out over time; the seal was unilaterally taken down by another MTSU President in 1989 and donated to Nathan Bedford Forrest State Park; but Forrest Hall persists. In 2006, a student movement emerged aspiring to change the name, and the student government agreed–only to reverse its decision a few days later.
The spontaneous creation of MTSU’s Nathan Bedford Forrest iconography reveals just how malleable symbols can be, including those of sporting mascots. The Blue Raiders mascot had nothing to do with Nathan Bedford Forrest in 1933; it has nothing to do with Forrest now. But for about 25 years in-between, one MTSU President molded MTSU into a haven for Confederate mythology. Since the late-1980s (at least), a small-but-vocal cadre makes themselves heard whenever MTSU’s Forrest “traditions” are threatened, most often using phrases such as heritage
But, as seen here, MTSU’s connections to Forrest are tenuous at best and bear no validity. If the connection to Forrest is valid, then why doesn’t MTSU mention Forrest a single time in official histories? Why did MTSU quickly sever ties with Confederate symbolism during the late-1960s? Why does the most recent published history of MTSU refer to the mid-century attachment to Forrest as a “passing fad”?
Almost entirely because of student protest and public outcry, MTSU Presidents consistently re-evaluate the appropriateness of Forrest connections around campus. More often than not since 1970, they conclude that Forrest is bad for business and that it projects an image of white supremacy (and they are correct in that conclusion). Further, student government has proven to be an utter failure at least twice now in successfully removing a Confederate tradition foisted upon them by a President Smith seventy years ago. It is now up to President McPhee to tacitly accept a false tradition foisted upon us by Smith or to be an agent of positive change like President Scarlett was in the 1970s.
As I professed at the beginning of this post, I admit that I cannot separate myself from this story. I am truly ashamed to work at a place where I can see “Forrest” out of my office window. I’m not the only one, as Phil Oliver (Philosophy professor) publicly stated: “I’m embarrassed every time I teach there.”
When MTSU built its ROTC building in 1954, President Smith named it Forrest Hall in honor of Nathan Bedford Forrest’s reputation as an “intrepid Confederate cavalry leader who won fame with his brilliant raids.” Maybe that was Forrest’s reputation in 1954, but in 2015 Forrest’s reputation is one of hate, racism, and violence. We do not want or need that at MTSU. I urge students, staff, faculty, and anyone who cares about MTSU to finally rid the university of this last blatant symbol of the Confederacy on campus.
I think a lot of the stuff—it’s history. I mean these things are factual, but they belong in a history book, and they belong in a museum. They don’t belong in public—especially on buildings. They don’t belong in places like that. Put them in places where they ought to be at.–Sylvester Brooks
Note: I would like to thank the staff of the Albert Gore Research Center at MTSU for their generous assistance in researching this article.
Josh Howard is a PhD Candidate in the Public History Program at Middle Tennessee State University. His research interests include sports history, Appalachia, and public history. His ongoing dissertation research explores the use of informal data collection techniques in museum visitor studies. Most recently, he completed a web exhibit and archive based on the Wendell Smith Papers for the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum. He is also the social media editor for this blog. Get in touch with Josh at Joshua.Howard@mtsu.edu or on Twitter via @jhowardhistory.
References (All Available at the Albert Gore Research Center)
 Middle Tennessee State College Dedication, 25 Mar. 1958.
 “The Mid-Stater Alumni Bulletin,” MTS College, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 1960.
 Lisa Pruitt, Holly Barnett, and Nancy Morgan, editors, Middle Tennessee State University (Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2001), 68.
 “The Mid-Stater Alumni Bulletin,” MTSU, Fall 1984, 9.
 “The Mid-Stater Alumni Bulletin,” MTS College, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 1960.
 “Everything but Confederate Money,” 1968, Albert Gore Research Center.
 The Mid-Stater Alumni Bulletin, MTS College, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 1960.
 Matt Bolch, “Raider name evolved, but not without controversy,” Sidelines, undated .
 Sidelines, 17 Mar. 2008.
 Brooks interview. Transcript, Sylvester Brooks Oral History Interview, 30 Sep. 2000, by Erin Toomey, 26, Albert Gore Research Center.
 “The Mid-Stater Alumni Bulletin,” Fall 1984, 9.
 MTSU Diamond Anniversary, 7 Sep. 1976.
 “The Mid-Stater Alumni Bulletin,” Fall 1976, 17.
 Erin Edgemon, “Scarlett put MTSU on path toward change,” DNJ, 1 Jun. 2004.
 Gwynn Thayer, Gordon Belt, Taffey Hall, and Nancy Morgan, “MTSU Confederate Symbolism Documentation Project,” Appendix A, IMG_0695.
 Middle Tennessee State College Dedication, 25 Mar. 1958, Pittard Collection, Albert Gore Research Center.
22 thoughts on “A Confederate on Campus: Nathan Bedford Forrest as MTSU’s Mascot”
Pingback: A Confederate on Campus: Nathan Bedford Forrest as MTSU’s Mascot | J. Howard, History
The once-hardened soldier became a born-again Christian, and the ferocity that previously had marked his personality was transformed into a mild-mannered, kindly, meekness as he called for the KKK to disband, and spoke out in favor of black civil rights. – See more at: http://columbiadailyherald.com/opinion/letters-editor/case-nathan-bedford-forrest#sthash.Ksq6txy9.dpuf
Thanks for reading Stephanie. The question of Forrest Hall isn’t so much about who or what Forrest was, but about how the memory of Forrest was deployed by MTSU in the 1940s, 50s, 60s, and 70s. During that time, Forrest was a symbol of white supremacy, without question. There is also no question that administrators (primarily MTSU President Quinn Smith) used the image of Forrest to intimidate a growing civil rights movement as African Americans pushed for the right to attend MTSU. It is beyond time for MTSU to purge this public image.
Maybe Forrest did have a legitimate change of heart in his final years–nobody can really know–but there is no way to absolve or redeem Forrest for his absolutely reprehensible (even for the time) actions. Here’s a good summary of some: http://werehistory.org/nathan-bedford-forrest/
I’m not denying the previous use of Forrest during the civil rights movement, but would rather like to emphasize the fact that people can change, we can know for sure that Forrest did as his history is documented. Simply removing symbols does not change hatred, but looking to the changes that occurred in Forrest can give us hope that we too can be transformed as a nation. Stigmatizing things with labels of hate and only representing one side of this man does him and all of us a great disservice, but moving forward together into the peace, unity, and forgiveness that is represented in the transformation and redemption of Forrest could be a good lesson for those of us today. Forrest was forgiven by God Almighty, he was absolved and redeemed for his actions. God Almighty is our example to follow.
He gave one speech. It takes more than that to prove a true change in a person.
Again, the issue isn’t Forrest. The issue is how people in the mid-twentieth century deployed the memory and image of Forrest.
The issue is how people would rather hang on to their hatred, let it fester and continue to grow.
I found this somewhat late. 🙂 But in case there are others who are reading it in 2018, part of the article is wrong. You referenced an article in the Sidelines, March 17, 2008, but it is wrong. You wrote “MTSU classrooms finally integrated in 1962, with athletic integration coming three years later when the first African-American athlete debuted on the track and field team. Three more years later, in 1968, J.W. Harper became the first African-American player on MTSU’s football team, but even at this late date the football locker room and dormitories remained segregated.” I was a student at MTSU and I am white. I started going there in the Fall of 1967, living in a dorm. It was not segregated. There were African American girls in my dorm. One of their mothers brought Sunday dinner nearly every Sunday. She also brought more than her daughter and roommate needed, so it was a ritual that other girls in the dorm met in their room for dinner. There weren’t a lot of us since MTSU was a weekday school where nearly everyone went home for the weekend, but those who were there, (me) enjoyed home cooking almost every weekend.
Pingback: Understanding the public history of MTSU’s Forrest Hall Controversy: Think Civil Rights, Not Civil War | elizabeth catte, public historian
Pingback: Understanding MTSU’s Forrest Hall Controversy: Think Civil Rights, Not Civil War | elizabeth catte, public historian
Pingback: September with the History Department | MTSU Department of History
This was a great article! However I would like to ask if the movement to take down Forrest Hall is going anywhere? When did the mascot of today first appear? When I first saw this blog the name Nathan Bedford Forrest popped in my head immediately because he was mentioned in Forrest Gump as the leader of the KKK. What I really liked about the article was that there was a history on Forrest, because I never knew any of that stuff about him. If Forrest had no ties to the university then why use him as an icon? Thank you for the great read!
Thank you for the kind comments and for reading! To answer your questions…
The movement to change the name of Forrest Hall is very much so alive. MTSU President Sidney McPhee is still forming a committee to recommend what to do about it. That committee is chaired by Dr. Derek Frisby and, as of right now, no other members have been publicly named. In short, it’s moving slow, but it’s still moving.
The mascot of today, Lightning the winged horse, debuted in 1998 when MTSU moved from D1-AA to D1-A football. As far as I know, Lightning was the outcome of focus groups, committees, and (possibly) a company hired to create it.
Finally, your question “If Forrest had no ties to the university then why use him as an icon?” is a really tough one to answer. I think there’s very strong evidence that MTSU students and administrators during the 1940s and 50s were quite beholden to white supremacy, so Forrest was a logical choice. My evidence of this is, for example, an image of Forrest pulling out a KKK hood in a mid-1950s MTSU yearbook, linked here: https://twitter.com/SarahCalise/status/647141466683383808.
Other people writing about MTSU argue that MTSU students became enthralled with Confederate imagery in the 1950s and 1960s because it was just part of a cool, kitsch trend. In light of the image linked above, a cross burning on campus, and other events going on at the time (like the Dixiecrat movement, George Wallace, Southern backlash to the Civil Rights Movement), it seems much more likely that MTSU Presidents embraced Forrest as a way of linking the university to hate-filled movements in the broader South.
Hope that addressed your questions!
Pingback: A Confederate on campus: The case of MTSU’s Forrest Hall | Public History Commons
Pingback: The Forrest Hall “Task Force” : Round One | elizabeth catte, public historian
Pingback: Forrest Hall Info Dump: Getting Inside the President’s Head | J. Howard, History
Last year “Nathan Bedford Forrest Middle School in Jacksonville, FL, got renamed. Surely MTSU needs to follow that example. That it has not already done so shows intellectual poverty.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An excellent point and one that should be brought to the attention of the ongoing Forrest Hall Task Force. Thank you for reading!
Like many urban cities that are led by social democrats, Jacksonville has some of the worst test scores, crime, drop outs, etc. In the US.
Pingback: Towards a Public Sport History | Sport in American History
Pingback: Towards a Public Sport History « Sport Heritage Review
Pingback: Reflections on Sport & Public History, NCPH 2016 | Sport in American History
Pingback: ICYMI: An Overview of Nearly Everything We Wrote in 2016 | Sport in American History